Skip to content
  • Home / Monthly Archives: September 2013

Monthly Archives: September 2013

Researchers to assist Fair Work Commission on pay equity

A research team based at Adelaide Law School has been engaged by the Fair Work Commission to prepare a research report on the equal remuneration provisions in the Fair Work Act. Under that Act, the Commission can make orders to ensure pay equity between male and female workers. This power has already been used to […]

Posted in Work and Employment Regulation | Tagged , |

Comments Off on Researchers to assist Fair Work Commission on pay equity

Corporate Law Teachers Association Conference 2014

Hosted by the Adelaide Law School The University of Adelaide at the National Wine Centre Adelaide 2 to 4 February 2014 In 2014 the University of Adelaide will host the Corporate Law Teachers Association’s (CLTA) annual conference at the National Wine Centre in Adelaide. The conference will run from Sunday, 2 February to Tuesday, 4 […]

Posted in Corporate and Commercial Law | Tagged , , , |

Comments Off on Corporate Law Teachers Association Conference 2014

‘The “Authorities Proviso”: the Scope of the Discretion to Exclude Evidence for Public Policy’

Authors: David Caruso and Chong Tsang Status: Drafting Abstract: This article addresses whether the discretion to exclude evidence on the grounds of public policy as formulated in Bunning v Cross should be limited to situations in which the improper or unlawful conduct in obtaining the evidence was that of ‘the authorities’.

Posted in Litigation Law, Publications | Tagged |

Comments Off on ‘The “Authorities Proviso”: the Scope of the Discretion to Exclude Evidence for Public Policy’

‘The Basis of the “Basis Rule”: the Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion’

Authors: David Caruso and Trang Phan Status: Pending Review Abstract: The ‘basis rule’ is, in general terms, a rule which restricts expert witnesses to giving opinion evidence in respect of which there is or will be proof, by other admissible evidence, of the facts and assumptions upon which the opinion is based. There has been […]

Posted in Litigation Law, Publications | Tagged |

Comments Off on ‘The Basis of the “Basis Rule”: the Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion’

‘The Case in Australia for Further Reform to the Cross-Examination and Court Management of Child Witnesses’

Authors: David Caruso and Timothy Cross Status: Published: (2012) 16(4) International Journal of Evidence and Proof 364-397 Abstract: Recent legislative reforms in Australia designed to address the difficulties attending the reception and treatment of child evidence will have little, if any, success because they do not address the reasons for the difficulties, nor introduce improvements […]

Posted in Litigation Law, Publications | Tagged |

Comments Off on ‘The Case in Australia for Further Reform to the Cross-Examination and Court Management of Child Witnesses’

‘The Executive Institution of Mercy in Australia: The Case and Model for Reform’

Authors: David Caruso and Nicholas Crawford Status: Published: (2014) 37(1) University of New South Wales Law Journal 312-348 Abstract: Post-conviction review procedures in Australia have been static despite significant reform in other Commonwealth countries. Responsibility for review and the powers to do so, collectively, the ‘Institution of Mercy’ (‘IOM’), are vested in the executive of […]

Posted in Litigation Law, Publications | Tagged |

Comments Off on ‘The Executive Institution of Mercy in Australia: The Case and Model for Reform’

‘Rethinking Leading Questioning: the Directive/Non-Directive Psychological Divide’

Authors: David Caruso, Dr Jacqueline Wheatcroft and James Krumrey-Quinn Status: Forthcoming: Criminal Law Review Abstract: There is a dearth of legal and psychological consideration of the leading question during the trial process. This article argues the current approach to the leading question does not assist or promote the accuracy of witness evidence, particularly witnesses likely […]

Posted in Litigation Law, Publications | Tagged |

Comments Off on ‘Rethinking Leading Questioning: the Directive/Non-Directive Psychological Divide’

Why Representation and Resources are Critical to Access to Justice in Minor Civil Jurisdictions: the Experience of Advisory Services in Minor Civil Claims

Authors: Margaret Castles, David Caruso, Associate Professor Anne Hewitt Status: Invited, Forthcoming: University of New South Wales Court of Conscience Journal Abstract: This article argues that appropriate involvement of the legal profession in minor civil proceedings, rather than its exclusion, will best facilitate efficient proceedings and ensure rectitude of outcome. We recommend that initiatives are […]

Posted in Litigation Law, Publications | Tagged |

Comments Off on Why Representation and Resources are Critical to Access to Justice in Minor Civil Jurisdictions: the Experience of Advisory Services in Minor Civil Claims

Austria’s Law against Defamation of Religion – Public Lecture

When: Monday, 28 October, 2013 at 12.00 noon Where: Moot Court Room, Ligertwood Building, Law School Speaker: Professor Greg Taylor Professor Greg Taylor is an honorary Professor of the University of Marburg, Germany, and an associate professor of law at Monash University. His undergraduate education was in law and German language and literature at the […]

Posted in Society, Law and Religion | Tagged , , |

Comments Off on Austria’s Law against Defamation of Religion – Public Lecture
Adelaide Law School
Address

Ligertwood Building The University of Adelaide SA 5005

Contact
Phone: +61 8 8313 5063
Fax: +61 8 8313 4344