In an article published on The Conversation, Dr Adam Webster examines whether the Senate can force the removal of a royal commissioner. Click here to read Adam’s article.
BLOGS WEBSITE
Posted on September 8, 2015 by a1068313
Comments Off on Can the Senate force the removal of a royal commissioner?
Posted on September 4, 2015 by a1068313
On the AUSPUBLAW blog Dr Anna Olijnyk examines the public’s reaction to the apprehended bias test. Is it time to rethink the mythical construct of the ‘fair-minded lay observer’? Click here to read Anna’s analysis. And click here for Anna’s most recent article on The Conversation explaining Dyson Heydon’s decision to dismiss the apprehended bias […]
Comments Off on Apprehended bias: a public critique of the fair-minded lay observer
Posted on September 2, 2015 by a1068313
Accommodating Rights? Religion, Speech and Equality in Australia a symposium to discuss aspects of the ALRC’s Freedoms Inquiry The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) in partnership with the Public Law and Policy Research Unit (PLPRU) and the Research Unit for the Study of Society, Law and Religion at Adelaide Law School invite you to attend […]
Comments Off on EVENT: Accommodating Rights? Religion, Speech and Equality in Australia
Posted on August 18, 2015 by a1068313
In an article posted on The Conversation, Dr Anna Olijnyk explains the claims of ‘apprehended bias’ made against Royal Commissioner Dyson Heydon. Click here to read Anna’s article.
Comments Off on Explainer: Dyson Heydon and claims of ‘apprehended bias’
Posted on August 13, 2015 by a1068313
In an article published on New Matilda, Dr Adam Webster examines whether a plebiscite or referendum are really necessary to legislate on marriage equality. Click here to read Adam’s article.
Comments Off on Would A Plebiscite On Marriage Equality Do Anything?
Posted on August 3, 2015 by a1068313
In the forthcoming edition of the Melbourne University Law Review (vol 39(1)), Dr Adam Webster examines the argument that the common law could provide a solution to interstate river disputes. The following is the abstract of the article: In Australia, the sharing of water from a river — such as the Murray River — that flows […]
Comments Off on Sharing Water from Transboundary Rivers in Australia — An Interstate Common Law?
Posted on July 30, 2015 by a1068313
Earlier this month the PLPRU, in conjunction with the Adelaide Law School, hosted a professional development day for high school Legal Studies teachers. Twenty teachers from private and public schools across South Australia attended the workshop. This is the second year the Adelaide Law School has organised this event and it is hoped the School […]
Comments Off on Legal Studies Teachers’ Professional Development Day
Posted on July 22, 2015 by a1068313
On the AUSPUBLAW blog Dr Peter Burdon and Associate Professor Alex Reilly argue that revoking citizenship for engaging in terrorist activities weakens Australian citizenship for no positive gain. Click here to read their post.
Comments Off on Revoking citizenship for engagement in terrorist activity weakens Australian citizenship for no positive end
Posted on June 14, 2015 by a1068313
This post was first published on AUSPUBLAW, the Australian Public Law Blog. AUSPUBLAW is a recently launched national platform for academics, practitioners and others from across Australia to communicate their research and provide expert commentary on topical public law issues. Visit the blog to learn more: www.auspublaw.org BY JUDITH BANNISTER Freedom of information (FOI) reform […]
Comments Off on The last word on the public interest in FOI: Australia and the United Kingdom compared
Posted on June 7, 2015 by a1068313
Dr Anna Olijnyk, committee member of the Australian Institute of Administrative Law (SA Chapter) invites you to attend the following event: The Ombudsman’s new role under the Return to Work Act Presenter: Wayne Lines, South Australian Ombudsman Wayne Lines was appointed as the South Australian Ombudsman effective from 18 December 2014. Mr Lines is just […]
Comments Off on EVENT: The Ombudsman’s new role under the Return to Work Act